<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons for open source product/service systems: Xara&#8217;s failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2007/open-p2p-design/lessons-for-open-source-productservice-systems-xaras-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2007/open-p2p-design/lessons-for-open-source-productservice-systems-xaras-failure/</link>
	<description>Design for Complexity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back from Sci(bzaar)net&#8230; at Open Peer-to-Peer Design</title>
		<link>http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2007/open-p2p-design/lessons-for-open-source-productservice-systems-xaras-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Back from Sci(bzaar)net&#8230; at Open Peer-to-Peer Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openp2pdesign.org/blog/archives/113#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d like now to summarize my contribution and some brief reflections resulting from the brainstorming. As you can imagine, I have participated as an &#8220;Open Culture expert&#8221; and not about scientific research/publication. The main idea that I wanted to share with the participants is that we should think about Open Culture not as a simple set of publication practices ( &#8220;to publish a specific content with a specific license&#8221;) but as a real philosophy based on enabling complex systems. Open Culture is not just use a Creative Commons license: it means to facilitate a system that shares and reuses the information self-organizing independently. Thinking about Open initiatives in a reductionist way, just like the use of a specific license, can only lead to failure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d like now to summarize my contribution and some brief reflections resulting from the brainstorming. As you can imagine, I have participated as an &#8220;Open Culture expert&#8221; and not about scientific research/publication. The main idea that I wanted to share with the participants is that we should think about Open Culture not as a simple set of publication practices ( &#8220;to publish a specific content with a specific license&#8221;) but as a real philosophy based on enabling complex systems. Open Culture is not just use a Creative Commons license: it means to facilitate a system that shares and reuses the information self-organizing independently. Thinking about Open initiatives in a reductionist way, just like the use of a specific license, can only lead to failure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
